|
There are significant differences between
the nine states which make up Brazilian Amazônia in ecological
terms, as well as from the point of view of economic occupation
and destruction of vegetal cover. While three of the states are
responsible for around 70% of the annual deforestation in the
region, others maintain their stocks of resources practically
intact given that they fall outside the area most affected by economic expansion.
In 1999, the
Brazilian Ministry of the Environment undertook a process of
dialogue with the Amazon states with the purpose of
jointly defining guidelines and priorities to keep deforestation
in check and, at the same time, to foster sustainable economic
activities. This process, to which the name Positive Agendas
was given, made it possible to draw up pacts between the federal
government and different organized sectors within the states, thereby facilitating
implementation of new instruments aimed at monitoring the use
of natural resources and controlling their despoliation, rehabilitating
the ravaged areas and resolving conflicts related to access to these resources.
Drawing up these pacts, together with efforts to
respond to demands made by the states within the context of the
Positive Agendas, was carried out under the auspices of the Natural resources Policy
Project (SPRN), the aim of which is to invest in decentralization
of environmental management policies through what are known as
the Integrated Environmental Management Projects (PGAI). In general,
the SPRN investments focus on strengthening state and municipal
bodies that are responsible for carrying out activities concerned
with environmental policies. Such investments have made it possible
to acquire equipment and vehicles for state bodies and for the
training of their technicians with the objective of improving
instruments for the monitoring and control of the use of natural
resources. Activities supported by the SPRN comprise integration of management
activities between states and municipalities, the drafting of
environmental laws and the creation of negotiating for resolving
conflicts involving access to natural resources.
The experience of the PGAI in the states
of Legal Amazônia
has shown that decisions shared among different institutions can
produce more effective results. Shared management makes it possible
to gain a clearer view of local needs and leads to improved liaison
with correlated initiatives, all of which serves to enhance involvement
by the interested parties and to improve the chances of success.
|
|